Fun fact: A backwards question mark is used to denote irony, sarcasm, or a rhetorical question!
It goes without saying that this upset a lot of Lolitas. Again, assuming you've been living in a cave, you're probably more than familiar with the fact that the biggest argument against Lolita is the fact that the fashion is called "Lolita" combined with the fact some styles of it are childish looking to many people, leading people to jump to conclusions about all sorts of devious activities that they think Lolitas are up to. But, this isn't going to be a blog post about why it's simply wrong to assume these things about Lolitas, because we all know that by now. Instead I'd like to talk a little about the documentary and my thoughts on the community's reaction to it.
I'd like to begin by saying that when I saw the poster, I cringed at it. My first reaction was "Oh god, I hope no one I know sees this poster!" because I don't exactly look forward to making the Lolita-has-nothing-to-do-with-pedophilia speech. My second reaction was "Well, doesn't that sound controversial?" and, wouldn't you know, a quick hop over to the documentaries site has this quote:
Scores of Lolitas were so upset by the mere appearance of a Lolita in a documentary about pedophilia that a petition was actually started, Lolitas were urged to send emails expressing their anger to the documentary's maker, and there were even people discussing actually showing up to the premier and protesting, in Lolita of course.
Frankly, I think these are all really bad ideas.
Let's get the most obvious bad idea out of the way first: this documentary is intended to be controversial, therefore, it is probably thriving off the controversy that many Lolitas are throwing at it. I can easily imagine that the petition Lolitas have started with end up being quoted, by the makers of the film, as being one of the big selling points of the film's controversiality (um, is that even a word?). To have a group of Lolitas show up to the premier to protest this film would probably be one of the best thing that could happen to this particular film in terms of advertisement. In a case like this, for a film that is billing itself as "The most controversial film ever made", if you want it to go away, your best bet would be to ignore it and to not actually make a controversy of it.
The other reason why I think this is a bad idea is really more of a personal opinion of mine and it has to do with the petition and those who hope that enough strongly worded emails will make the filmmakers to reconsider even releasing the film. Personally, I think it's wrong to try to strong-arm someone into doing or not doing something just because you disagree with it. It is the film maker's right to make a film voicing their opinion about whatever they want, and I feel it would be morally wrong to stop them from saying whatever they want, in whatever medium they choose, just because I, or anyone, disagrees with it. Yes, even if I feel like their opinion is wrong or misleading. They have every right to make the film, just as I have every right to don a fluffy dress with cupcakes on it and carry a purse shaped like a rabbit head to go grocery shopping in (Incidentally, I actually own neither of those things, my dresses mostly have flowers on them, and my purse is shaped like a bat).
I also am obviously part of the minority in the Lolita community that doesn't believe this film should never see the light of day for fear that it might make people jump to conclusions about the Lolita fashion, as if they don't already, and I debated whether or not I should even make this post because I just sort of didn't want to get involved. But I guess I am involved, even if just because I do wear the same style of clothes of a girl on a poster, so there's no sense in pretending as if I don't have an opinion on the matter.
So, instead of urging you to sign a petition or write angry emails demanding a film not be made, I'm going to urge you to take a deep breath, and just calm down. If you don't like the idea of the film, complain to your friends about it and then don't watch it, but don't try to stop it from being shown because you disagree with it, or even worse, show up to the premier dressed like the movie poster proclaiming just how controversial this self-proclaimed controversial film is. There are plenty of times when petitions and protests are 100% appropriate if you disagree with something, but I do not believe that this is that time.
What are my thoughts on this particular film? Like I mentioned above, the self-proclaimed "controversy for controversy's sake" angle really turns me off of some films, but if it wasn't for that, based on the trailer it just looks like any other documentary about the subject, and I really don't see a reason to hate it, or even think it's somehow "more controversial" than any other documentary out there.
Again, I'm not going to urge you to sign any petitions, or even to agree with me, I'm just going to urge you to give it two seconds thought and be reasonable about whatever your actions are. If you don't agree with the film, and dislike the use of Lolita in it, that's perfectly fine, but maybe you should give it a second thought before you really do turn an unknown film into the "most controversial film ever" that it hopes to be.
You can check out this page on EGL, which links to the various topics that were posted on the subject of this film, including the petition. You can also check out the film's website here, because if you haven't yet, and are considering signing a petion or demanding that they change their film to suit yourself, I hope you've at least learned all you possibly can about exactly what it is you're trying to stop.
Post Script: I didn't want to go into this, because at this point it is only rumor, but since people keep mentioning it in the comments I may has well. In regards to the model supposedly being tricked into doing the photoshoot: as far as I know the model has not actually said anything at all about her modeling for the poster. There are also two different stories I have heard, one saying the model was told the photoshoot was for a fashion spread, and one saying that there were actually a group of Lolitas who were going to pose for the photo, but after hearing what the movie was about, they all dropped out but her. However, I don't know if either of these rumors are true, and I'm not going to make any assumptions based on what is just a rumor at this point.
While I firmly believe that the filmmakers have the right to do as they please, my biggest issue is with the actual film poster. From my understanding, the girl in the poster was not told that her photo was going to be used for this, that rather it was for a "fashion shoot".ReplyDelete
THE REST OF THE WORLD VIEWS YOU ALL AS WOMEN-CHILDREN!
The rest of the world views you as a 6-year-old troll. HAHAHAHAHA!Delete
I simply think it is dangerous to sit by idly and allow public media to put out false impressions such as this. I'm a lolita, but I am a goth as well. The false way in which the media has portrayed goths for years led to (especially in Europe) goths being physically mugged, raped, beat-up and even a few being killed. In the less drastic extent of things, especially in the 90s, we were easily outcast of churches (I am a born-again fundamentalist Christian, as well as a goth and a lolita, so this really deeply has affected my life), schools, ext.ReplyDelete
Something reaching more of the public in such a light about lolita (spreading a dangerous and potentially deadly disease) would hurt a lot of us.
I agree with you to an extent, all due respect, but I have never seen the method of, "look away and it'll go away" work in the real world. Usually, it just causes things to get worse.
Thank you, you've said everything I was thinking, only I wouldn't have been able to say it so eloquently. Basically, when I saw the poster and noticed the text that said 'There are two sides to every story.' I wanted to vomit.ReplyDelete
As for thinking it's okay to be attracted to teenage girls, saying that being a pedophile is wrong but being an ephebophile is okay is sickening. I can't even begin to comprehend this movie at all..
I have a problem for three major reasons. Yes, people jump to conclusions about our fashion and they do not need this giving them any more reasons to throw proverbial stones. Or real stones, as pedophilia and anything associated with it tends to angry up the blood. But pedophilia is not about grown women looking childlike, it's about actual children, and this simply makes them look like they don't even know their own subject matter. And last, what about the men? They are getting the rawest deal of all out of this.ReplyDelete
I typed it in on Google after reading this article, and the picture is different from that Loli girl there. Now it's just some random lady's face. Not sure if this is official, but I hope they keep our FASHION out of it.ReplyDelete
But can you all look past the outfit thing? I know I'm going to watch the movie, documentary, whatever it is when it comes out because I have some things to say on that subject.
What are you all talking about here?
The fashion, or pedophiles?
Personally, I'm more offended by the film's apparent take on the subject of pedophilia than the Lolita poster. Judging from the trailer I watched, the documentary appears to be portraying pedophilia as acceptable alternative to "normal" sexual practices -- or even attempting to paint it as a "normal" sexual practice... Which to me, is an incredibly horrible thing to do.ReplyDelete
At first, my attention (and ire) was drawn by the Lolita poster (otherwise, I likely never would have heard of it) but after watching the trailer, I found something that was much more troubling than a mere representation of a fashion that I happen to dress in and admire. Honestly, I think Lolitas will always have to deal with the "pedo-bait" stereotype/misconception just as Goths have to deal with the "all Goths are Satanists/Evil" stereotype/misconception and so on. It's not good, it's not cool but it's just the way society chooses to percieve alternative subcultures/fashions.
However, like I said, I am much more troubled and upset by the documentary's take on pedophilia. I may be more sensitive than most about it but I'm most certainly not the only one that feels that way (though, it seems that people who noticed the film's deplorable stance on pedophilia were in the minority in the Lolita community as compared to those bitching and whining about the poster spreading the misconception about their chosen style of dress.)...
I don't think the documentary is going to make it very far, honestly -- most people won't leave the theatre/film festival going "My, I never realized how ACCEPTABLE AND NORMAL the sexual abuse of children is! I'm now going to advocate this!" but the way they seemed to have tackled the subject in the documentary (judging from the quotes they chose in the trailer, which was likely done to help promote controversey, but regardless of that...) is kind of troubling to me.
It's a really difficult subject to get into. I think that if people are going to complain about a film, they really ought to do it for a better reason than one of the posters creating additional fuel for a common misconception about an alternative fashion subculture...
Sorry about commenting with such a massive rant >o<
Sorry, I can get rather defensive and I feel very strong about this. I'm not trying to start drama or anything of the like, forgive me if I upset you, but I felt you were dismissing my thoughts out of turn. I didn't meanto be rude to you. I really did like your post. It was a new and freash look on the subject.ReplyDelete
Psst, I think they're just a troll!ReplyDelete
This is kind of an old post but, I think what upset me most about the cover is that it /reinforces/ an idea that most people have about Lolita. People assume that Lolita is about pedophilia, and when you try to convince them otherwise, they could easily use this as a point against you. "If Lolita isn't about pedophilia, then why is a Lolita on the cover of a movie about pedophilia?"ReplyDelete
Well, to be honest, this movie poster (and movie) looks like simple trolling. On the other hand, I wouldn't say, that every movie with every kind of message should be shown to the public, same with books. It's a bit of an extreme example, but would you let people legally show outspokenly racist, sexist or any other kind of hatred inciting movie? And based on what the poster says about the two sides of the story, it kinda worth the anxiety... In fact, I don't think the model has to do anything with lolita fashion, so these rumors are just dumb. Her skirt is far too short, she doesn't really wear accessories, and she simply doesn't create the impression of a real life lolita... Most movie producers wouldn't bother to find realy lolitas, if the movie is not about them. But considering that this is just some obscure indie documentary, I don't think any loli will every meet someone who watched it or had seen the poster and remembers it.ReplyDelete
Print Plotter Kalkir A0ReplyDelete
Print Plotter Kalkir A1
Print Plotter Kalkir A2
Print Plotter Poster A0
Print Plotter Poster A1
Print Plotter Poster A2